Saturday, October 23, 2010
Tuesday, October 5, 2010
Notice of Application for Judicial Review - October 22, 2010 - POINT n Click Version in Blog Format
Court File No: T-1724-10
FEDERAL COURT
BETWEEN:
EDWARD DARREN ACHTEM
Applicant
and
RHONDA ROSE ACHTEM
and JUSTICE BONNIE RAWLINS and JUSTICE KAREN HORNER
and KATHLEEN LINTON and LEGAL AID ALBERTA
and JUSTICE DALLAS MILLER
and JUSTICE CAROLE CONRAD and JUSTICE PETER MARTIN
and JUSTICE ALEXANDER PARK
and JUSTICE IAN BINNIE and JUSTICE LOUISE CHARRON
and JUSTICE ROSALIE SIBERMAN ABELLA
and CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL
and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALBERTA
and THE CRIMINAL CROWN PROSECUTOR OF ALBERTA
and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
Respondents
------------------------------
Notice of Application
------------------------------
TO THE RESPONDENT(S):A PROCEEDING HAS BEEN COMMENCED by the applicant. The relief claimed by the applicant appears on page 6 of this application.
THIS APPLICATION will be heard by the Court at a time and place to be fixed by the Judicial Administrator. Unless the Court orders otherwise, the place of hearing will be as requested by the applicant. The applicant requests that this application be heard at the Federal Court in Calgary, Alberta.
IF YOU WISH TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION, to receive notice of any step in the application or to be served with any documents in the application, you or a solicitor acting for you must prepare a notice of appearance in Form 305 prescribed by the Federal Courts Rules and serve it on the
page 2
after being served with this notice of application.
Copies of the Federal Courts Rules, information concerning the local offices of the Court and other necessary information may be obtained on request to the Administrator of this Court at Ottawa (telephone 613-992-4238) or at any local office.
IF YOU FAIL TO OPPOSE THIS APPLICATION, JUDGMENT MAY BE GIVEN IN YOUR ABSENCE AND WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE TO YOU.
_______________________
(Date)
Issued by: ___________________________
(Registry Officer)
Address of local office: ___________________________________
To:
1. Rhonda Rose Achtem
xxx xxxx Crescent NE
Medicine Hat, Alberta T1C xxx
2. JUSTICE BONNIE RAWLINS
Judicial District of Medicine Hat
Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
Law Courts, 460 1st Street SE
Medicine Hat, Alberta T1A 0A8
3. Justice Karen M. Horner
Judicial District of Medicine Hat
Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
Law Courts, 460 1st Street SE
Medicine Hat, Alberta T1A 0A8
4. KATHLEEN LINTON
10426 81 Avenue NW
Edmonton, Alberta T6E 1X5
page 3
5. LEGAL AID ALBERTA
10320 – 102nd AvenueEdmonton, Alberta T5J 4A1
6. JUSTICE DALLAS MILLER
Judicial District of Medicine Hat
Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
Law Courts, 460 1st Street SE
Medicine Hat, Alberta T1A 0A8
7. Justice Carole Conrad
Court of Appeals of Alberta
TransCanada Pipelines Tower
2600, 450-1st St., S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 5H1
8. Justice Peter Martin
Court of Appeals of Alberta
TransCanada Pipelines Tower
2600, 450-1st St., S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 5H1
9. Justice Alexander Park
Court of Appeals of Alberta
TransCanada Pipelines Tower
2600, 450-1st St., S.W.
Calgary, Alberta T2P 5H1
10. Justice Ian Binnie
Supreme Court of Canada
301 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0J1
11. Justice Louise Charron
Supreme Court of Canada
301 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0J1
12. Justice Rosalie Siberman Abella
Supreme Court of Canada
301 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0J1
13. CANADIAN JUDICIAL COUNCIL
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0W8
page 4
14. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ALBERTA3rd floor, Bowker building
9833 – 109 Street
Edmonton, Alberta T5K 2E6
15. THE CRIMINAL CROWN PROSECUTOR OF ALBERTA
615 Macleod Trail SE
Calgary, Alberta T2G 4T8
16. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CANADA
284 Wellington Street
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H8
page 5
Application
This is an application for judicial review in respect of:
Judicial District of Medicine Hat
Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
Action Number: 4808 009302
Reasons of Judgement of Justice Karen Horner
Leaving all remaining NOT yet split Matrimonial property and assets to the Defendant Rhonda Rose Achtem. The Applicant alleges that the Judgement lead to an unfair unreasonable 95 percent - 5 percent split in Ms. Achtem's favour based on separation date July 23, 2003. Leaving only 5 percent to the Plaintiff Edward Darren Achtem from a divorce with zero $0.00 exemptions.
Matrimonial Trial date: May 17, 2007.
The decision was communicated to the Applicant on: July 13, 2007.
page 6
The applicant makes application for:
1. Due to the length of the Applicant's Affidavit, a 10 day extension of time is required for the respondents to serve their affidavits upon the applicant. 40 days instead of the usual 30 days. This is to accommodate Respondents with ample time.
2. The Federal Court to; determine who may have sent the Honourable Court into disrepute. Determine if the Trial judge breached the powers of separation principal and the functus officio doctrine. Determine as to whether or NOT; if the Reasons for Judgement of Justice Karen Horner, is unlawful, criminal, and reasonable. Determine if it is just misconduct. Determine if she has caused the Court to become sent into disrepute. Determine as to whether or NOT; if her conduct was; accident or deliberate. Determine if the Defendant Rhonda Rose Achtem; if she has breached sections 6(1), 6(2), 28(1), and 28(2) of the Canada Evidence Act C-5. Determine if she is is responsible for the alleged offenses and bringing the Court into disrepute. Quash the alleged impugned decision.
3. Application of sections 24.(1) and 24.(2) of the Charter. For the Trial Judge's slip in drawing of Judgment. That lawlessly deprived the applicant of his alleged 50 percent share of matrimonial. From a divorce with $0.00 ZERO dollars exemptions. Due to the Judgment, and Orders stemming from it after. The applicant alleges that this is the main cause the lead him to having his Rights and Freedoms infringed upon. Pursuant to sections 1, 6.(1), 6.(1)(b), 7, 12, 14, 15.(1), 15.(2) of the Charter. Alleged lawlessness and said offences are the cause. Of the said infringement , infringing upon me, at this very moment and now. Ever since before Trial, under the colour of law must be stopped. Determine if it has, is, and has to be stopped. Or does Mr. Achtem continue to deserve this financial ravishment like he is a bug trapped in a jar judges have caused. Ms. Achtem enjoys the profits from her alleged fraud and the judicial negligence. Determine if this has to be stopped, enforce it. Craft an Order enforcing restitution.
4. First determine if the court is sent into disrepute. Then decide what to do next. Craft an Order, to deal with criminal proceedings as to whether they will be dealt with at Federal Court or it to be transferred to Provincial Court of Alberta. Craft an Order to deal with the Matrimonial Property issues, whether it be dealt with at Federal Court or transferred to a lower court. Craft an Order putting this in abeyance of the court first confirming percentages as to how much the defendant and the plaintiff received from matrimonial, subject to the information being provided.
5. Costs and damages.
The grounds for the application are:
1. The applicant is a human in a common law jurisdiction. He Alleges a breach of separation of powers principal and alleged breach of the functus officio doctrine by the Trial Judge, Justice Karen Horner. It is alleged she was taken away into malfeasance, as the accessory to the Defendant's alleged acts of Fraud and false pretences (after the fact). It is in the applicant's position that Justice Horner has purported to have committed offenses paragraphs 463(a), 362(1)(c), and 122 of the Criminal Code of Canada. By preventing Mr. Achtem any time to view documents at his request in the Witness Box. Justice Horner observed, admitted in the midst of Mr. Achtem's confusion from being an alleged intimidated Witness. By an alleged ambush of documents that she could not permit Ms. Achtem to adduce. Justice Horner
page 7
stated at Trial that Mr. Achtem did not have the exhibits. Justice Horner knew Mr. Achtem did not have documents presented at Trial. This maybe one of the many elements Justice Horner used to deliberately produce an alleged corrupted judgment. It shall be evidenced that she is an accessory that may have
brought the honourable court into disrepute. That ultimately lead to the alleged act of false pretenses. Which in turn ultimately gave way to Ms. Achtem's alleged act of FRAUD, Thusly bringing our honourable court into disrepute.
2. It is ALLEGED, on or before the 17th day, of May, 2007 A.D. Prior to, at, and after attending Trial. It is the applicant's position that Rhonda Rose Achtem has purported to have committed offences; paragraphs 380(a), and 362(1)(c) of the Criminal Code of Canada by preparing and producing documents that may have obstructed the course of justice, and thusly brought the honourable court into disrepute. It is alleged that Ms. Achtem has breached sections 6(1), 6(2), 28(1), and 28(2) of the Canada Evidence Act C-5. It is alleged that Rhonda Rose Achtem setup a Trial by Ambush as a deliberate premeditated attack on an individual who she know well and how to attack his disability. Ms. Achtem's alleged act of FRAUD and false pretence, thusly brought our honourable court into disrepute.
Notice of intent of Motions - paragraphs 3 to 6:
3. Kathleen Linton prepared an alleged false legal opinion for Legal Aid Alberta, January 21, 2008. It is the applicant's belief, this was a rigged setup directed by Legal Aid Alberta. None the less. It is the applicant's position that Kathleen Linton has purported to have committed offences paragraphs 122, 362(1)(c) of the Criminal Code of Canada. By deliberately preparing a false statement in writing. It is alleged she produced an incompetent legal opinion withOUT knowledge or researching. She did NOT use her ears when listening to me. I could hardly get a word in edge wise. She only talked and she knows everything and this is how it is going to be. She only has a mouth that speaks. No ears used for listening. Which lead her to the act of alleged false pretence. A Notice of Motion Application will be made soon.
4. It is the applicants position that Justice Carole Conrad has purported to have committed offences. Paragraphs 122, 131(1), and 362(1)(c) of the Criminal Code of Canada. By Preparing an alleged fictional Judgment. It is alleged along with 2 of her colleagues Justice Peter Martin, and Justice Alexander Park conspired together to make up their Judgment. Instead of making it based on facts and truth. They relied on some other unknown source Not conveyed by Me, Mr. Achtem, Therefore, the appeal panel produced a fictional Judgment by deliberately using fiction and writing it
down in their Memorandum of Judgment. A Reverse Onus Motion in a Notice of Motion Application will be made soon.
5. It is the applicants position that Justice Peter Martin has purported to have committed offences. Paragraphs 122, 131(1), and 362(1)(c) of the Criminal Code of Canada. By Preparing an alleged fictional Judgment. It is alleged along with 2 of his colleagues Justice Carole Conrad, and Justice Alexander Park conspired together to make up their Judgment. Instead of making it based on facts and truth. They relied on some other unknown source Not conveyed by Me, Mr. Achtem, Therefore, The appeal panel produced a fictional Judgment by deliberately using fiction and writing it down in their Memorandum of Judgment. A Reverse Onus Motion in a Notice of Motion Application will be made soon.
page 8
6. It is the applicants position that Justice Alexander Park has purported to have committed offences. Paragraphs 122, 131(1), and 362(1)(c) of the Criminal Code of Canada. By Preparing an alleged fictional Judgment. It is alleged that along with 2 of his colleagues Justice Carole Conrad, and Justice Peter Martin conspired together to make up their Judgment. Instead of making it based on facts and truth. They relied on some other unknown source Not conveyed by me, Mr. Achtem. Therefore, The appeal panel produced a fictional Judgment by deliberately using fiction and writing it down in their Memorandum of Judgment. A Reverse Onus Motion in a Notice of Motion Application will be made soon.
This application will be supported by the following material:
For public and respondents viewing: (The applicant's and all Respondents Applications, Motions, Affidavits and Exhibits will be posted on the internet at; judicialreviewcalgary.blogspot.com All of the applicant's EXHIBITS will be posted in 10 days, and the affidavit there now is subject to editing before the filing and serving deadline. Mr. Achtem feels having everything all posted online makes it so much easier to throttle through everything faster)
[1.] Affidavit: (5 days reading assignment EST) 10 days extra should be allotted to time line.
Part I and II Court Queens Bench break down and analysis.
Part III - break down and analysis of Court of Appeal of Alberta.
Part IV - break down and analysis of Supreme Court of Canada
Part V Conclusion
[2.] List of EXHIBITS as follows:
EXHIBIT 1 - Defendant's, 1st List of Exhibits.
EXHIBIT 2 - Defendant's, 2nd List of Exhibits.
EXHIBIT 3 - Analysis of Ms. Achtem's Exhibits M to R and Cross-examination:
EXHIBIT 3A - Ms. Achtem's exhibit M.
EXHIBIT 3B - Ms. Achtem's Cross-examination of exhibit M (Transcript from EXHIBIT T4).
EXHIBIT 3C - The Proper Response to exhibit M.
EXHIBIT 3D - Ms. Achtem's exhibit N.
EXHIBIT 3E - Ms. Achtem's cross-examination of exhibit N (Transcript from EXHIBIT T4).
EXHIBIT 3F - The Proper Response to exhibit N.
EXHIBIT 3G - Ms. Achtem's exhibit O.
EXHIBIT 3H - Ms. Achtem's Cross-examination o exhibit O (Transcript from EXHIBIT T4).
EXHIBIT 3I - The Proper Response to exhibit O.
EXHIBIT 3J - Ms. Achtem's exhibit P.
EXHIBIT 3K - Ms. Achtem's Cross-examination of exhibit P (Transcript from EXHIBIT T4).
EXHIBIT 3L - The Proper Response to Rhonda Achtem's exhibit P.
EXHIBIT 3M - Ms. Achtem's exhibit Q.
EXHIBIT 3N - Ms. Achtem's Cross-examination of exhibit Q (Transcript from EXHIBIT T4).
EXHIBIT 3O - The Proper Response to exhibit Q.
page 9
EXHIBIT 3P - Ms. Achtem's exhibit R.
EXHIBIT 3Q - Ms. Achtem's Cross-examination of exhibit R (Transcript from EXHIBIT T4).
EXHIBIT 3R - The Proper Response to exhibit R.
EXHIBIT 4 : Mr. Achtem's Medical documents from Trial: was marked as Exhibit 2K at Trial. Marked as sub-exhibits to EXHIBIT 4 in this Affidavit listed are as follows:
EXHIBIT 4A Letter from Dr. Patry to Dr, Hunt January 13, 2000.
EXHIBIT 4B Letter from Dr. Patry to Dr, Hunt November 13, 2003.
EXHIBIT 4C Medical Visit Record with Dr. Hunt, October 28, 2003.
EXHIBIT 4D Medical Visit Record with Dr. Hunt July 16, 2004.
EXHIBIT 4E Letter from Dr. Patry to Dr, Hunt August 4, 2004.
EXHIBIT 4F Letter from H. Friesen to Dr. Hunt August 17, 2004.
EXHIBIT 4G Doctors Note from Dr. Gawlinski December 30, 2005.
EXHIBIT 4H Medical Visit Report with Dr. Bakker March 12, 2007.
Orders prior to Trial:
EXHIBIT 5A Order of Justice Hughes Family Chambers Hearing, May 6, 06. Filed June 28, 2006.
EXHIBIT 5B Pre-trial Order of Justice Rawlins, dated March 29th, 2007, filed April 2nd, 2007.
EXHIBIT 5C Pre-trial Court Notes of Justice Rawlins, filed March 29, 2007.
Court Services, MEP, and other government services:
EXHIBIT 6A Envelope S. Jobagy sent instructions to wrong address March 11, 2007.
EXHIBIT 6B Pre-trial Instructions sent to wrong address Shauna Jobagy, March 9, 2007.
EXHIBIT 6C Pre-trial Order prepared - letter from Shauna Jobagy April 2, 2007.
EXHIBIT 6D Clerks Pre-trial instructions, Civil Practice Note 5 Family Law Pretrial Conferences, Shauna Jobagy, February 14, 2007.
EXHIBIT 6E Letter from Gerry Marsh,/Alberta Justice TMS, Regional October 29, 2007.
EXHIBIT 6F Letter from AB Justice TMS Regional C. Reynolds October 31, 2007.
EXHIBIT 6G Reply from Court of Appeal to Mr. Achtem November 02, 2007.
EXHIBIT 6H DENIAL of Pre-trial Order from Shauna Jobagy, November 6, 2007.
EXHIBIT 6I Shauna Jobagy recovers the Pre-trial Order November 7, 2007.
EXHIBIT 6J Letter from Court of Appeal Registrar, January 8, 2008.
EXHIBIT 6K Operator licence cancellation/suspension notice from Alberta Justice Maintenance Enforcement, January 19, 2010.
EXHIBIT 6L e-mail from Shauna Jobagy, refusal to let the Plaintiff make an application unless he pays $750.00 to Ms. Sails (Achtem). Pursuant to the Order of Justice Miller EXHIBIT 9A. May 25, 2010.
EXHIBIT 6M Mr. Achtem received an e-mail Reply from Shauna Jobagy, September 07, 2010.
EXHIBIT 6N Letter from passport Canada Passport suspended due to MEP, September 15, 2010.
page 10
Mr. Achtem's Pre-trail Material:
EXHIBIT 7 Mr. Achtem's Pre-trail Material filed March 26, 2007. Sub-Exhibits to EXHIBIT 7 all documents filed together, are listed as follows:
EXHIBIT 7A Mr. Achtem's Pre-trial Summary, filed March 26, 2007.
EXHIBIT 7B Statement of assets, liabilities and exemptions, filed March 26, 2007.
EXHIBIT 7C Memorandum to Judge (Pre-trial judge) Dated March 4th, 2007, filed March 26, 2007.
EXHIBIT 7D Index to Originally filed and served Blue Binder, Mr. Achtem's Notice of Intentions of what documents he would be using at Trial, pursuant to sections 28(1) and 28(2) of the CEA C-5. Filed March 26, 2007.
Ms. Achtem's Pre-trial Material:
EXHIBIT 8 Ms. Achtem's Pre-trial Material, filed March 26, 2007. Sub-Exhibits to EXHIBIT 8 all documents filed together, are listed as follows:
EXHIBIT 8A Ms. Achtem's Concise Letter - Pre-trial, In lieu of a Pre-trial Summary .Filed Mar 26, (Pre-trial Summary is included).
EXHIBIT 8B Ms. Achtem's Statement of assets, liabilities, and exemptions, filed March 26, 2007.
EXHIBIT 8C (Duplicate of EXHIBIT 1) Ms. Achtem's st list of Exhibits filed March 26, 2007.
Orders after the Trial:
EXHIBIT 9A Order of Justice Dallas Miller - Family Special Chambers Hearing: Feb 1, 2008, Filed February 11, 2008.
EXHIBIT 9B Order of Justice Wilkins August 31, 2008.
EXHIBIT 9C Order of Justice Sulatycky, March 12, 2008.
EXHIBIT 9D Order of Justice Cairns August 6, 2009.
The Linton EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT 10A Letter from Ms. Linton to Legal Aid, January 21, 2008.
EXHIBIT 10B Letter from Legal Aid to Mr. Achtem January 24, 2008.
EXHIBIT 11 Certified General Accountant's Letter to the Supreme Court of Canada, an offer to prepare a balance sheet, November 25, 2008. Motion for the abeyance was dismissed.
EXHIBIT 12 : Materials SENT by Ms. Achtem - Court Documents/Letters/emails:
EXHIBIT 12A Letter Ms. Sails SENT to the Court of Appeal of Alberta September 12, 2007.
EXHIBIT 12B Letter Rhonda Sails SENT to the Court of Appeals of Alberta, January 24, 2008.
EXHIBIT 12C Letter Ms. Achtem sent to Mr. Achtem, May 24, 2008.
EXHIBIT 12D Ms. Achtem Received an e-mail from Mr. Achtem, June 3, 2008.
EXHIBIT 12E Ms. Achtem Received an e-mail from Mr. Achtem, June 8, 2008.
EXHIBIT 12F Ms. Achtem Motion filed July 14, 08. Heard by Justice Wilkins, July 31, 2008.
EXHIBIT 12G Ms. Achtem's Affidavit filed July 14, 08. Application Heard by Justice Wilkins, July 31, 2008.
EXHIBIT 12H Ms. Achtem Replied to Mr. Achtem's email, July 22, 2008.
EXHIBIT 12I Ms. Achtem's SCC Response, October 7, 2008.
EXHIBIT 12J Rhonda Sail's sent Letter to SCC, October 30, 2008.
page 11
EXHIBIT 12K Letter Ms. Achtem sent to Mr. Achtem, December 22, 2008.
EXHIBIT 12L Ms. Achtem sent an email to Mr. Achtem, January 22, 2009.
EXHIBIT 12M Ms. Achtem's Affidavit, July 15, 2009.
EXHIBIT 13 Complaints letters, e-mails sent, court documents by Mr. Achtem:
EXHIBIT 13A Complaint Sent to TMS Regional, October 29, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13B Complaint Sent to TMS Regional, October 29, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13C Complaint Sent to Court of Appeal, October 30, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13D Complaint Sent to TMS Regional October 31, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13E Complaint Sent to Shauna Jobagy, November 6, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13F Complaint Sent to TMS Regional, November 6, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13G Complaint to Chief Justice Wachowich and Canadian Judicial Council and other public officials, November 7, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13H Complaint Sent to Shauna Jobagy, November 9, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13I Complaint Sent to Chief Justice Wachowich, December 4, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13J Complaint Sent to Justice Minister of Alberta Ron Steven and Canadian Judicial Council, December 5, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13K Complaint Sent to Canadian Judicial Council, December 9, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13L Complaint Sent to public officials December 12, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13M Complaint Sent to Ed Stelmach, December 17, 2007.
EXHIBIT 13N Letter sent to the Court of Appeal, January 7, 2008.
EXHIBIT 13O Complaint Sent to Chief Justice Wachowich, January 9, 2008.
EXHIBIT 13P Complaint Sent to Canadian Judicial Council, January 09, 2008.
EXHIBIT 13Q Complaint sent to Court of Appeal, January 14, 2008.
EXHIBIT 13R Complaint sent to Legal Aid Alberta, January 23, 2008.
EXHIBIT 13S Complaint sent to Chief Justice K. Fraser, June 17, 2008.
EXHIBIT 13T Complaint sent to Justice Wilkins, July 30, 2008.
EXHIBIT 13U Letter sent to Supreme Court of Canada,November `2008(approx date)
EXHIBIT 13V Complaint sent to federal Prime Minister Ministers of Canada, Justice Minister of Alberta, Justice Minister of Canada, and others, March10, 2009
Complaint Replies and Replies from people in public officials or their representatives:
EXHIBIT 14A Complaint reply from Justice Minister Ron Stevens, August 27, 2007.
EXHIBIT 14B Complaint reply from Peggy Kobly, October 4, 2007.
EXHIBIT 14C Complaint reply from Peggy Kobly, October 9, 2007.
EXHIBIT 14D Complaint reply from Canadian Judicial Council, October 10, 2007.
EXHIBIT 14E Complaint reply from Canadian Judicial Council, October 10, 2007.
EXHIBIT 14F Complaint reply from Peggy Kobly, October 12, 2007.
EXHIBIT 14G Complaint reply introduction from Peggy Kobly, November 15, 2007.
EXHIBIT 14H Complaint reply from Chief Justice Wachowich, November 26, 2007.
EXHIBIT 14I Complaint reply from Peggy Kobly, December 5, 2007.
EXHIBIT 14J Complaint reply from Peggy Kobly, December 13, 2007.
EXHIBIT 14K Complaint reply from Canadian Judicial Council, January 3, 2008.
EXHIBIT 14L Complaint reply Justice Minister Ron Steven, January 16, 2008.
EXHIBIT 14M Complaint reply from Canadian Judicial Council, February 21, 2008.
EXHIBIT 14N Complaint reply from Canadian Judicial Council, March 30, 2009.
page 12
EXHIBIT 14O Complaint Reply from Justice Minister of Alberta, A. Redford, April 6, 2009.
EXHIBIT 14P Complaint Reply from Canadian Judicial Council, July 9, 2009
EXHIBIT 15 Analysis of the alleged fictions by the appeal panel breakdown dissection of the alleged lies” on their Memorandum of Judgment
EXHIBIT 16 Statement of Division of Assets Since separation(Mr. Achtem's Trial exhibit analysis): Supporting Documents for EXHIBIT 16 are listed as follows:
EXHIBIT 16A Letter from Your Lawyer regarding sale to Mackenzie (Red Cliff home sale)
EXHIBIT 16B Residential Real Estate Purchase Contract; To purchase the Medicine Hat home, June 22, 2003.
EXHIBIT 16C Alberta Registries Land Title Certificate (Medicine Hat Home Purchase)
EXHIBIT 16D Residential Real Estate Purchase Contract; July 14, 2003. (Calgary home purchase)
EXHIBIT 16E Certificate of Title (Calgary home purchase)
EXHIBIT 16F ATB Financial Statement of Disclosure (Calgary home purchase)
EXHIBIT 16G ATB Loan Agreement; August 8, 2003 (Calgary home purchase)
EXHIBIT 16H Land Titles Act Mortgage (Calgary home purchase)
EXHIBIT 16I Investment Property Information (Calgary home purchase)
EXHIBIT 16J Letter from Litwiniuk and Company, March 2, 2004. To Jim Markley Re: Edward Achtem Statement Funds (Calgary home Sale)
EXHIBIT 16K Letter Litwiniuk and Company; April 12, 2004. Re: Sale of Calgary home
EXHIBIT 17 Analysis of Mr. Achtem's Financial Situations:
Before separation, on separation, after separation, after loosing his house through the form of alleged Fraud and his current financial situation today. And how the alleged fraud has effected Mr. Achtem.
Supporting Documents for EXHIBIT 17 are listed as follows:
EXHIBIT 17A Mr. Achtem's Revenue Canada Income Tax Notices of Assessments 1999 to 2009
EXHIBIT 17B Adriana Gutierrez Galindo's (Mr. Achtem's current wife) Revenue Canada Income Tax Notices of of Assessments 2007, 2008, and 2009.
EXHIBIT 17B Edward Achtem's TD Canada Trust account statements. Bank Statements from July 1, 2003 to April 30, 2004 (missing February and March 2003).
EXHIBIT 17C Edward Achtem's TD Visa Statements from July 1, 2003 to September 10, 2003.
EXHIBIT 17D HatFax's TD Canada Trust Bank Statements from July 1, 2003 to January 30, 2004.
EXHIBIT 17E ATB Financial (joint) Account Information
EXHIBIT 17F ATB Financial (joint) MasterCard Information
EXHIBIT 17G RBC Visa Statement, November 3, 2009. (Plaintiff stop paying as of November 2008)
EXHIBIT 17H Demand letter from TD Canada Trust to pay $9,291.30
EXHIBIT 17I Letter from Global Collect, demand to pay TD visa.
EXHIBIT 17J TD Visa Statement, August 8, 2010. (Plaintiff stopped paying as of January 2010.)
EXHIBIT 17K OVER PAYMENT that has to bee paid from Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, August 28, 2010.
page 13
Cross reference material from the Trial and the Appeal:
EXHIBIT 18A Mr. Achtem's EVIDENCE BINDER #2 INDEX (table of contents) of Mr. Achtem's Blue Exhibit Binder used at Trial)
EXHIBIT 18B Mr. Achtem Table of Contents of the Appellant's Appeal Books,
Please Note: Ms. Achtem's Table of Contents for Trial is referred to as 2nd List of Exhibits marked as EXHIBIT 2, and Ms. Achtem did NOT file any appeal material.
EXHIBIT 19 Whatever financial information Mr. Achtem has on Ms. Achtem which is limited to what was produced at the Trial.
Mr. Achtem's Medical Information NOT used at Trial, that the appeal refused to view, This information was NOT available to Mr. Achtem until after the Trial:
EXHIBIT 20A OT Multiple Sclerosis Assessment, OPTIMUS program, January 23, 2004.
EXHIBIT 20B OPTIMUS Intake Assessment, March 15, 2004.
EXHIBIT 20C Treatment Summary OPTIMUS Program, March 23, 2004.
EXHIBIT 20D MRI Diagnostic Imagining Report, Study of Mr. Achtem's Brain, June 17, 2008.
EXHIBIT 20E Doctor's note from Dr. D. Miu, February 2009.
[3.] VERBATIM - Transcript and Audio EXHIBITS:
Pre-trial Transcript EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT X From 1st transcript prepared by TMS Regional; Trial withOUT the Order/Order deleted from transcript, 1st page 37.
EXHIBIT T1 From 2nd transcript prepared by TMS Regional; Trial instructions, agreement concerning exhibit, and the funny Order NOT read into the record; page 34, line 44 to page 38, line 21.
Trial Transcript:
EXHIBIT T2 Transcript page 39 to page 45
EXHIBIT T3 Trial Transcript pages 94 to 101
EXHIBIT T4 Trial transcript page 108 to page 161.
EXHIBIT T6 Trial Transcripts Pages 179 to 185.
Family Chambers Order Transcript:
EXHIBIT T7 Transcript of Justice Miller's Order February 1, 2008, transcript filed February 4, 2008.
Audio EXHIBITS (Trial):
EXHIBIT A1 Audio Alleged Witness Box Attack 1st Climax; [time 11:30:00 a.m. to 11:31:42 a.m.]
EXHIBIT A2 Audio Alleged Witness Box Attack 2nd Climax; [time: 11:43:32 a.m. to 12:03:08 p.m.].
page 14
[4.] Table of Authorities.
[5.] Judgments:
1. Judicial District of Medicine Hat Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta
Action No. 4808 009302 Reason for Judgment of Justice Karen M. Horner; July 13, 2008.
2. Court of Appeal of Alberta Appeal No. 0701-0232AC Memorandum of Judgment; May 7, 2008.
3. Supreme Court of Canada SCC No. 32805 Judgment; December 12, 2008.
Dated at Calgary, Alberta this 22 day of October, 2010.
X_____________________________
Signature of Applicant
The Applicant's name and address is:
Edward D. Achtem
2620 xx Avenue SE
Calgary, Alberta T2A xxx
The Applicant does not have a phone or a fax number. For rush situations use the applicant's e-mail address .
Respondents and the Registry may send to the applicant's email address at; edwach@shaw.ca All e-mails sent to the applicant will be confirmed in a reply e-mail.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
